- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Cube 600 vs PR-4300
BladeCine Cube 600 vs Denver PR-4300
What Cube 600 does better (5) and where PR-4300 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is Cube 600 better than PR-4300?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)600 lm vs 400 lm+50%
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · PR-4300: No
- Wi-FiYes · PR-4300: No
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · PR-4300: No
Why is PR-4300 better than Cube 600?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 2560 × 1440 (QHD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 2560 × 1440 (QHD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 600 lm | 400 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 8,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.39:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.08 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 50″ | — |
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 20 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 26 dB | — |
| Weight | 3.5 kg | — |
| Width | 272 mm | — |
| Height | 241 mm | — |
| Depth | 187 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Grey, White |
