- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- BW-V5 vs Neopix 130
BlitzWolf BW-V5 vs Philips Neopix 130
What BW-V5 does better (4) and where Neopix 130 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
BW-V5Neopix 130
| BW-V5 | Neopix 130 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 93 mm | 162 mm | −69 mm |
| Width | 220 mm | 141 mm | +79 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 123 mm | +67 mm |
| Weight | 1.2 kg | 1.5 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is BW-V5 better than Neopix 130?
- Light source life50,000 h vs 30,000 h+67%
- Largest image size170″ vs 70″2.4×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 500:12×
- Weight1.2 kg vs 1.5 kg+25%
Why is Neopix 130 better than BW-V5?
- Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
- Wi-FiNo · BW-V5: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 120 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 3,800 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 170″ | 70″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 44 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.2 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Width | 220 mm | 141 mm |
| Height | 93 mm | 162 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 123 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
