- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- C00D vs PR-4300
Bolwins C00D vs Denver PR-4300
What C00D does better (1) and where PR-4300 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is C00D better than PR-4300?
- Wi-FiYes · PR-4300: No
Why is PR-4300 better than C00D?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 400 lm2×
- Audio outputNo · C00D: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 2560 × 1440 (QHD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 400 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 8,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 50,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | Grey, White |
