How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. DBX3 Pro vs NeoPix 730

Dangbei DBX3 Pro vs Philips NeoPix 730

What DBX3 Pro does better (2) and where NeoPix 730 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Dangbei DBX3 Pro
Dangbei · 2023DBX3 Pro
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$1,000
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 730
Philips · 2023NeoPix 730
8.9Score
0 advantages
8.8Setup & placement2.3

Why is DBX3 Pro better than NeoPix 730?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix 730: No

Why is NeoPix 730 better than DBX3 Pro?

NeoPix 730 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Dangbei DBX3 ProDangbei DBX3 Pro≈ US$1,0009.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLP—
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HLG—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate60 Hz—
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.65:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.65 m
Largest image size—120″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Obstacle avoidanceYes—
Automatic screen fitYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—20 W
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital PlusYes—
DTSYes—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—2
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—2.7 kg
Width—305 mm
Height—119 mm
Depth—319 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare