- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PR-4700 vs NeoPix 140
Denver PR-4700 vs Philips NeoPix 140
What PR-4700 does better (2) and where NeoPix 140 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.9Picture2.4
Why is PR-4700 better than NeoPix 140?
- Largest image size180″ vs 65″2.8×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 1,000:12×
Why is NeoPix 140 better than PR-4700?
- Wi-FiNo · PR-4700: Yes
- Audio outputNo · PR-4700: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| 4K method | 4K input only (downscaled) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 40″ | — |
| Largest image size | 180″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.3 kg |
| Width | — | 68 mm |
| Height | — | 142 mm |
| Depth | — | 74 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
