- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- PR-4852 vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD
Denver PR-4852 vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
What PR-4852 does better (2) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is PR-4852 better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm vs 200 lm3.5×
- Light source life50,000 h vs 3,500 h14.3×
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than PR-4852?
Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| 4K method | 4K input only (downscaled) | — |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 700 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Height | 113 mm | — |
| Depth | 219 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black, White |









