How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. PR-4852 vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD

Denver PR-4852 vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD

What PR-4852 does better (2) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Denver PR-4852
Denver · 2026PR-4852
2 advantages≈ US$170
vs
Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
0 advantages

Why is PR-4852 better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm vs 200 lm3.5×
  2. Light source life50,000 h vs 3,500 h14.3×

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than PR-4852?

Luma 400 tragbarer HD has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Denver PR-4852Denver PR-4852≈ US$170
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution—1280 × 720 (HD)
4K method4K input only (downscaled)—
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,500:1
Lens & placement
AutofocusYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiNo—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life50,000 h3,500 h
Design & noise
Height113 mm—
Depth219 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack, White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare