How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. N1 vs NeoPix 530

Emotn N1 vs Philips NeoPix 530

What N1 does better (3) and where NeoPix 530 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Emotn N1
Emotn · 2023N1
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$280
vs
Philips NeoPix 530
Philips · 2023NeoPix 530
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
6.3Setup & placement2.2
4.7Smart features & sound6.4

Why is N1 better than NeoPix 530?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix 530: No
  2. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix 530: No
  3. Largest image size120″ vs 100″+20%

Why is NeoPix 530 better than N1?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 14 W+40%
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Audio outputNo · N1: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Emotn N1Emotn N1≈ US$2804.2
Philips NeoPix 530Philips NeoPix 530≈ US$2508.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)330 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HLG—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.25:11.43:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.77 m3.17 m
Smallest image size60″—
Largest image size120″100″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W14 W
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital PlusYes—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—2.7 kg
Width—274 mm
Height—107 mm
Depth—294 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare