- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EH-QL3000 vs TYY0061
Epson EH-QL3000 vs TopVision TYY0061
What EH-QL3000 does better (4) and where TYY0061 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is EH-QL3000 better than TYY0061?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1 vs 12,000:1416.7×
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · TYY0061: No
Why is TYY0061 better than EH-QL3000?
- Weight21.1 kg vs 6.9 kg3.1×
- Audio outputNo · EH-QL3000: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | 3LCD | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | Laser | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,000 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 9,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | 12,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10 | — |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.52:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.47:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.37 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 50″ | — |
| Largest image size | — | 350″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.6× | — |
| Lens shift | Vertical | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 437 W | — |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 28 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 26 dB | — |
| Weight | 21.1 kg | 6.9 kg |
| Width | 568 mm | — |
| Height | 192 mm | — |
| Depth | 568 mm | — |
| Colours | — | White |
