- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EH-QL7000 vs DLA-NZ9
Epson EH-QL7000 vs JVC DLA-NZ9
What EH-QL7000 does better (2) and where DLA-NZ9 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is EH-QL7000 better than DLA-NZ9?
- Audio outputYes · DLA-NZ9: No
- Weight21.1 kg vs 25 kg+18%
Why is DLA-NZ9 better than EH-QL7000?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 100,000:133.3×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- 4K method4K by pixel shifting vs Native 4K
- Ethernet (LAN)No · EH-QL7000: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | Native 4K |
| Display technology | 3LCD | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 10,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 100,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical and horizontal |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 440 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 24 dB |
| Weight | 21.1 kg | 25 kg |
| Width | 568 mm | — |
| Height | 192 mm | — |
| Depth | 568 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Blue, Yellow, Black |
