How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. EH-QS100 vs AZW430UST

Epson EH-QS100 vs Optoma AZW430UST

What EH-QS100 does better (2) and where AZW430UST wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Epson EH-QS100
Epson · 2024EH-QS100
6.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$3,200
Higher score
vs
Optoma AZW430UST
Optoma · 2024AZW430UST
2 advantages≈ US$1,950
Dimensions

Size comparison

EH-QS100AZW430UST
695 × 156341327 × 110328
EH-QS100AZW430USTDifference
Height156 mm110 mm+46 mm
Width695 mm327 mm+368 mm
Depth341 mm328 mm+13 mm
Weight12 kg4 kg+8 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is EH-QS100 better than AZW430UST?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,500 lm vs 3,200 lm+41%
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is AZW430UST better than EH-QS100?

  1. Weight12 kg vs 4 kg3×
  2. Fan noise34 dB vs 27 dB+26%
Specifications

Side by side

Epson EH-QS100Epson EH-QS100≈ US$3,2006.2
Optoma AZW430USTOptoma AZW430UST≈ US$1,950
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)—
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)—
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technology3LCDDLP
Light sourceLaserLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,500 lm3,200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio0.16:10.14:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)0.22:1—
Throw typeUltra short throw (under 0.4:1)Ultra short throw (under 0.4:1)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image0.35 m0.31 m
Smallest image size80″—
Largest image size160″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)Yes—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputNo—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption333 W—
Light source life20,000 h—
Light source life (eco mode)20,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise34 dB27 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)20 dB—
Weight12 kg4 kg
Width695 mm327 mm
Height156 mm110 mm
Depth341 mm328 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare