How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Lifestudio Flex EF-72 vs Mars 3

Epson Lifestudio Flex EF-72 vs Nebula Mars 3

What Lifestudio Flex EF-72 does better (2) and where Mars 3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Epson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
9.7Score
2 advantages≈ US$1,000
Higher score
vs
Nebula Mars 3
Nebula · 2023Mars 3
9.1Score
2 advantages≈ US$930
9.8Picture9.4
6.8Smart features & sound9.8

Why is Lifestudio Flex EF-72 better than Mars 3?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Fan noise28 dB vs 32 dB+14%

Why is Mars 3 better than Lifestudio Flex EF-72?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 40 W4×
  2. Largest image size150″ vs 200″+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Nebula Mars 3Nebula Mars 3≈ US$9309.1
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technology3LCDDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1—
HDR supportYesYes
HDR formatsHDR10, HLGHDR10
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size30″30″
Largest image size150″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W40 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TVAndroid (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Internal storage—8 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI eARCYes—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise28 dB32 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)22 dB—
Weight—4.5 kg
Width—160 mm
Height—260 mm
Depth—250 mm
ColoursBrownBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare