- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Lifestudio Flex EF-72 vs Titan Noir Ultra
Epson Lifestudio Flex EF-72 vs XGIMI Titan Noir Ultra
What Lifestudio Flex EF-72 does better (1) and where Titan Noir Ultra wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Picture9.2
Why is Lifestudio Flex EF-72 better than Titan Noir Ultra?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1 vs 12,000:1416.7×
Why is Titan Noir Ultra better than Lifestudio Flex EF-72?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,000 lm vs 8,000 lm8×
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 24 W2.4×
- Lens shiftNone vs Vertical and horizontal
- HDMI inputs1 vs 33×
- Largest image size150″ vs 300″2×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · Lifestudio Flex EF-72: Yes
- Audio outputNo · Lifestudio Flex EF-72: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | 3LCD | DLP |
| Light source | LED | RGB triple laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | 8,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | 12,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| Colour gamut (BT.2020) | — | 110% |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Input lag | — | 1 ms |
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| VRR / ALLM | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.98:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.17 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.04× |
| Lens shift | None | Vertical and horizontal |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Yes |
| Automatic screen fit | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 24 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 3 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 28 dB | 28 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 22 dB | — |
| Weight | — | 8.1 kg |
| Width | — | 334 mm |
| Height | — | 178 mm |
| Depth | — | 248 mm |
| Colours | Brown | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
8.79.7
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
8.99.7
vs
Xiaomi Vali 1vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
9.39.7
vs
Epson Lifestudio Flex EF-72vsKodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
vs
ONOAYO ONO3ProvsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
9.39.7
vs
BenQ GV50vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
6.39.7