- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Lifestudio Pop EF-61 vs Xming Page Two
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61 vs Formovie Xming Page Two
What Lifestudio Pop EF-61 does better (7) and where Xming Page Two wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Picture7.3
8.0Setup & placement6.8
6.8Smart features & sound6.8
5.9Noise, lifetime & portability2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Lifestudio Pop EF-61Xming Page Two
| Lifestudio Pop EF-61 | Xming Page Two | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 75 mm | 190 mm | −115 mm |
| Width | 199 mm | 207 mm | −8 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 127 mm | +63 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 2 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Lifestudio Pop EF-61 better than Xming Page Two?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm vs 500 lm+40%
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · Xming Page Two: No
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1 vs 2,000:12,500×
- Fan noise24 dB vs 30 dB+25%
- Largest image size150″ vs 120″+25%
- Weight1.6 kg vs 2 kg+25%
- Power consumption83 W vs 100 W+20%
Why is Xming Page Two better than Lifestudio Pop EF-61?
Xming Page Two has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | 3LCD | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 700 lm | 500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | HDR10 |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.25:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 2.77 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Automatic screen fit | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2.1 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 83 W | 100 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 20 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 2 kg |
| Width | 199 mm | 207 mm |
| Height | 75 mm | 190 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 127 mm |
| Colours | — | Grey |
Related comparisons
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsXGIMI MoGo 4 LED Exclusive
8.78.1
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsEpson Lifestudio Pop EF-62
8.78.9
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
8.79.7
vs
XGIMI MoGo 2 Pro Gen 2vsEpson Lifestudio Pop EF-61
8.88.7
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsONOAYO ONO3Pro
8.79.3
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsViewSonic M1S