- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Lifestudio Pop EF-61 vs CineBeam Q Mini PU600U
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61 vs LG CineBeam Q Mini PU600U
What Lifestudio Pop EF-61 does better (6) and where CineBeam Q Mini PU600U wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Picture9.5
8.0Setup & placement5.3
6.8Smart features & sound2.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Lifestudio Pop EF-61CineBeam Q Mini PU600U
| Lifestudio Pop EF-61 | CineBeam Q Mini PU600U | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 75 mm | 135 mm | −60 mm |
| Width | 199 mm | 80 mm | +119 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 135 mm | +55 mm |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.5 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Lifestudio Pop EF-61 better than CineBeam Q Mini PU600U?
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 4 W2.5×
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · CineBeam Q Mini PU600U: No
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm vs 600 lm+17%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1 vs 450,000:111.1×
- Audio outputYes · CineBeam Q Mini PU600U: No
- Largest image size150″ vs 120″+25%
Why is CineBeam Q Mini PU600U better than Lifestudio Pop EF-61?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Weight1.6 kg vs 1.49 kg+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | 3LCD | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 700 lm | 600 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 5,000,000:1 | 450,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | HDR10 |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | 50″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Automatic screen fit | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 4 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | webOS (LG) |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | — | LG ThinQ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI eARC | Yes | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 83 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 20 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.49 kg |
| Width | 199 mm | 80 mm |
| Height | 75 mm | 135 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 135 mm |
| Colours | — | Grey |
Related comparisons
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsXGIMI MoGo 4 LED Exclusive
8.78.1
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsEpson Lifestudio Pop EF-62
8.78.9
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsEpson Lifestudio Flex EF-72
8.79.7
vs
XGIMI MoGo 2 Pro Gen 2vsEpson Lifestudio Pop EF-61
8.88.7
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsONOAYO ONO3Pro
8.79.3
vs
Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-61vsViewSonic M1S