How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Lifestudio Pop EF-62 vs ONO3Pro

Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62 vs ONOAYO ONO3Pro

What Lifestudio Pop EF-62 does better (1) and where ONO3Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Epson Lifestudio Pop EF-62
8.9Score
1 advantage≈ US$690
vs
ONOAYO ONO3Pro
ONOAYO · 2025ONO3Pro
9.3Score
3 advantages
Higher score
9.7Picture9.3
6.0Setup & placement7.1
6.8Smart features & sound9.6

Why is Lifestudio Pop EF-62 better than ONO3Pro?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)

Why is ONO3Pro better than Lifestudio Pop EF-62?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 30 W3×
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm vs 800 lm+14%
  3. Largest image size150″ vs 300″2×
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technology3LCD—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)700 lm800 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Smallest image size30″—
Largest image size150″300″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W30 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)YesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI eARCYes—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption95 W—
Design & noise
Fan noise24 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)20 dB—
Weight1.6 kg—
Width199 mm—
Height75 mm—
Depth190 mm—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare