How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Whale Pro vs NeoPix 450

ETOE Whale Pro vs Philips NeoPix 450

What Whale Pro does better (2) and where NeoPix 450 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

ETOE Whale Pro
ETOE · 2025Whale Pro
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$360
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 450
Philips · 2025NeoPix 450
5.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$320
3.4Picture2.5
6.8Setup & placement9.7
7.7Smart features & sound4.7

Why is Whale Pro better than NeoPix 450?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,500 lm vs 500 lm3×
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)20 W vs 10 W2×

Why is NeoPix 450 better than Whale Pro?

  1. Audio outputNo · Whale Pro: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

ETOE Whale ProETOE Whale Pro≈ US$3605.6
Philips NeoPix 450Philips NeoPix 450≈ US$3205.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,500 lm500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HDR10—
Lens & placement
Largest image size200″—
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Google TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)YesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant—
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Weight—2.48 kg
Width—195 mm
Height—219 mm
Depth—194 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare