How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ESP-300 vs MC425

Extralink ESP-300 vs HP MC425

What ESP-300 does better (0) and where MC425 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Extralink ESP-300
Extralink · 2026ESP-300
3.7Score
0 advantages≈ US$230
vs
HP MC425
HP · 2026MC425
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$200
Higher score
2.3Picture4.3
4.4Setup & placement7.0

Why is ESP-300 better than MC425?

ESP-300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is MC425 better than ESP-300?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)120 lm vs 200 lm+67%
  2. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  4. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications

Side by side

Extralink ESP-300Extralink ESP-300≈ US$2303.7
HP MC425HP MC425≈ US$2005.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)120 lm200 lm
Lens & placement
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Power consumption—55 W
Light source life—20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—1 kg
Width—120 mm
Height—156 mm
Depth—102 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare