How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Xming Page Two vs M1S

Formovie Xming Page Two vs ViewSonic M1S

What Xming Page Two does better (3) and where M1S wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Formovie Xming Page Two
Formovie · 2025Xming Page Two
5.7Score
3 advantages≈ US$480
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic M1S
ViewSonic · 2025M1S
0 advantages≈ US$610

Why is Xming Page Two better than M1S?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  3. Wi-FiYes · M1S: No

Why is M1S better than Xming Page Two?

M1S has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

ViewSonic M1SViewSonic M1S≈ US$610
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Motion interpolation (MEMC)Yes—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.25:11:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.77 m2.21 m
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size120″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesNo
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs1—
HDMI version2.1—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputYes—
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Power consumption100 W—
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight2 kg—
Width207 mm—
Height190 mm—
Depth127 mm—
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare