How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. C2TUK-PRO vs NeoPix 730

Hisense C2TUK-PRO vs Philips NeoPix 730

What C2TUK-PRO does better (3) and where NeoPix 730 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Hisense C2TUK-PRO
Hisense · 2023C2TUK-PRO
6.6Score
3 advantages
vs
Philips NeoPix 730
Philips · 2023NeoPix 730
8.9Score
2 advantages
Higher score
4.3Setup & placement2.3
7.2Smart features & sound9.0

Why is C2TUK-PRO better than NeoPix 730?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Largest image size300″ vs 120″2.5×
  3. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix 730: No

Why is NeoPix 730 better than C2TUK-PRO?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:1 vs 3,000:1+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000:13,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision—
Dolby VisionYes—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.65:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.65 m
Smallest image size60″—
Largest image size300″120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformVIDAAAndroid (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version2.1—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—2.7 kg
Width—305 mm
Height—119 mm
Depth—319 mm
ColoursSilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare