- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- CC500 vs NeoPix 244
HP CC500 vs Philips NeoPix 244
What CC500 does better (2) and where NeoPix 244 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Picture5.5
2.5Noise, lifetime & portability5.5
Why is CC500 better than NeoPix 244?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)260 lm vs 250 lm+4%
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 6 W+67%
Why is NeoPix 244 better than CC500?
- Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
- Fan noise32 dB vs 30 dB+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 260 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.25:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.77 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 45″ | — |
| Largest image size | 80″ | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 2.1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 95 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 32 dB | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 26 dB |
| Weight | — | 1.4 kg |
| Width | — | 140 mm |
| Height | — | 187 mm |
| Depth | — | 239 mm |
| Colours | Grey, Silver, White | White |
