- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- CP180 vs NeoPix 150
HP CP180 vs Philips NeoPix 150
What CP180 does better (0) and where NeoPix 150 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
2.0Picture2.2
Why is CP180 better than NeoPix 150?
CP180 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 150 better than CP180?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)130 lm vs 250 lm+92%
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · CP180: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 130 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.85 kg |
| Width | — | 126 mm |
| Height | — | 208 mm |
| Depth | — | 144 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
