- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MC400 vs NeoPix 106
HP MC400 vs Philips NeoPix 106
What MC400 does better (0) and where NeoPix 106 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is MC400 better than NeoPix 106?
MC400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 106 better than MC400?
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
- Audio outputNo · MC400: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 60 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | — | 50″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 2 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.51 kg |
| Width | — | 158 mm |
| Height | — | 73 mm |
| Depth | — | 121 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
