How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. MC475 vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD

HP MC475 vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD

What MC475 does better (2) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (1) — every spec side by side.

HP MC475
HP · 2026MC475
2 advantages≈ US$210
vs
Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
1 advantage
4.3Picture3.0

Why is MC475 better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than MC475?

  1. HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications

Side by side

HP MC475HP MC475≈ US$210
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,500:1
Lens & placement
Lens shiftNone—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiNo—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs01
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—3,500 h
Design & noise
ColoursBlackBlack, White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare