- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MC475 vs NeoPix 113
HP MC475 vs Philips NeoPix 113
What MC475 does better (2) and where NeoPix 113 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is MC475 better than NeoPix 113?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is NeoPix 113 better than MC475?
- Wi-FiNo · MC475: Yes
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
- Audio outputNo · MC475: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 65″ |
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.4 kg |
| Colours | Black | Black |
