- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MC475 vs NeoPix 256
HP MC475 vs Philips NeoPix 256
What MC475 does better (0) and where NeoPix 256 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
4.3Picture5.2
Why is MC475 better than NeoPix 256?
MC475 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 256 better than MC475?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 250 lm+25%
- Wi-FiNo · MC475: Yes
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 250 lm |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 1,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | Black | White, Silver, Grey |
