How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. MP250 vs PicoPix Micro+

HP MP250 vs Philips PicoPix Micro+

What MP250 does better (3) and where PicoPix Micro+ wins (2) — every spec side by side.

HP MP250
HP · 2022MP250
5.0Score
3 advantages≈ US$330
Higher score
vs
Philips PicoPix Micro+
Philips · 2022PicoPix Micro+
2 advantages
2.9Picture2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

MP250PicoPix Micro+
80 × 1408076 × 3474
MP250PicoPix Micro+Difference
Height140 mm34 mm+106 mm
Width80 mm76 mm+4 mm
Depth80 mm74 mm+6 mm
Weight0.6 kg0.2 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MP250 better than PicoPix Micro+?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 150 lm+67%
  2. AutofocusYes · PicoPix Micro+: No
  3. Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 3 W2×

Why is PicoPix Micro+ better than MP250?

  1. Weight0.6 kg vs 0.21 kg2.9×
  2. Audio outputNo · MP250: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

HP MP250HP MP250≈ US$3305.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)854 × 480 (480p)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm150 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—600:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m2.66 m
Largest image size—70″
Lens shiftVertical—
AutofocusYesNo
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)6 W3 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Own / Linux platform
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption45 W—
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight0.6 kg0.21 kg
Width80 mm76 mm
Height140 mm34 mm
Depth80 mm74 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare