- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Apex Challenger IN3048SL vs Osmo FlixPro
InFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SL vs Mavura Osmo FlixPro
What Apex Challenger IN3048SL does better (0) and where Osmo FlixPro wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.6Picture4.3
Why is Apex Challenger IN3048SL better than Osmo FlixPro?
Apex Challenger IN3048SL has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Osmo FlixPro better than Apex Challenger IN3048SL?
Osmo FlixPro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 200 lm |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 100″ | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 25,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.25 kg | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
InFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SLvsMagcubic L018
vs
Yaber L1vsInFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SL
vs
Strong Q1vsInFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SL
vs
InFocus Apex Challenger IN3048SLvsAOpen Fire Legend QH15s
vs
Mavura Osmo FlixProvsAurzen D1 Air
vs
Mavura Osmo FlixProvsReagle Full HD 4K 420 ANSI Android 14