- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- IN0024SL vs FLIK X10
InFocus IN0024SL vs Kodak FLIK X10
What IN0024SL does better (4) and where FLIK X10 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is IN0024SL better than FLIK X10?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · FLIK X10: No
- Audio outputYes · FLIK X10: No
Why is FLIK X10 better than IN0024SL?
- AutofocusNo · IN0024SL: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 3,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 800:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.4:1 | 1.3:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.24:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.1 m | 2.88 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 15 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 195 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 32 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 26 dB | — |
| Colours | White | — |
