How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. IN0024SL vs NeoPix 230

InFocus IN0024SL vs Philips NeoPix 230

What IN0024SL does better (4) and where NeoPix 230 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

InFocus IN0024SL
InFocus · 2024IN0024SL
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$380
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 230
Philips · 2024NeoPix 230
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ US$350
5.8Picture2.4
3.8Setup & placement8.6

Why is IN0024SL better than NeoPix 230?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 250 lm16×
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)15 W vs 10 W+50%
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix 230: No

Why is NeoPix 230 better than IN0024SL?

  1. AutofocusNo · IN0024SL: Yes
  2. Automatic keystone correctionNo · IN0024SL: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

InFocus IN0024SLInFocus IN0024SL≈ US$3807.3
Philips NeoPix 230Philips NeoPix 230≈ US$3504.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLaser—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm250 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.2:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)2.24:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m2.66 m
Smallest image size—48″
Largest image size—80″
Optical zoom2×—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNoYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)15 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption195 W—
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)26 dB—
Weight—2.5 kg
Width—239 mm
Height—187 mm
Depth—140 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare