- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- INL148 vs Halo+ GTV
InFocus INL148 vs XGIMI Halo+ GTV
What INL148 does better (4) and where Halo+ GTV wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is INL148 better than Halo+ GTV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm vs 900 lm3.3×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000,000:1 vs 200:110,000×
- Audio outputYes · Halo+ GTV: No
- Light source life30,000 h vs 25,000 h+20%
Why is Halo+ GTV better than INL148?
- Weight5.5 kg vs 1.6 kg3.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,000 lm | 900 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 2,000,000:1 | 200:1 |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.13:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.47:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.5 m | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.3× | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 15 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 161 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 28 dB | — |
| Weight | 5.5 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Colours | White | Grey |
