- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- INL2158 vs INL2169
InFocus INL2158 vs InFocus INL2169
What INL2158 does better (0) and where INL2169 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is INL2158 better than INL2169?
INL2158 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is INL2169 better than INL2158?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 4,500 lm+12%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)
- Maximum refresh rate120 Hz vs 130 Hz+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 4,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 300,000:1 | 300,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 130 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.21:1 | 1.21:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.59:1 | 1.59:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.68 m | 2.68 m |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 20 W | 20 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI version | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 211 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | 30 dB |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 4.6 kg |
| Width | 337 mm | — |
| Height | 265 mm | — |
| Depth | 119 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White |
