- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Nemesis IN1028ST vs UHZ35
InFocus Nemesis IN1028ST vs Optoma UHZ35
What Nemesis IN1028ST does better (5) and where UHZ35 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.8Picture8.1
8.2Noise, lifetime & portability5.3
Why is Nemesis IN1028ST better than UHZ35?
- AutofocusYes · UHZ35: No
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 3,500 lm+14%
- Audio outputYes · UHZ35: No
- Fan noise32 dB vs 35 dB+9%
- Optical zoom2× vs 1.6×+25%
Why is UHZ35 better than Nemesis IN1028ST?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Maximum refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 3,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 500,000:1 |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 0.5:1 | — |
| Throw type | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 1.11 m | — |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 195 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 32 dB | 35 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 26 dB | 28 dB |
| Weight | — | 4.2 kg |
| Width | — | 274 mm |
| Height | — | 114 mm |
| Depth | — | 216 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
