How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Orbital IN0061SL vs Photon Life PK32

InFocus Orbital IN0061SL vs Optoma Photon Life PK32

What Orbital IN0061SL does better (5) and where Photon Life PK32 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

InFocus Orbital IN0061SL
InFocus · 2025Orbital IN0061SL
7.2Score
5 advantages≈ US$750
Higher score
vs
Optoma Photon Life PK32
Optoma · 2025Photon Life PK32
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$690
9.0Picture3.8
2.6Setup & placement2.1
6.1Noise, lifetime & portability8.6

Why is Orbital IN0061SL better than Photon Life PK32?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 1,100 lm3.6×
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000,000:1 vs 400:12,500×
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. Fan noise27 dB vs 32 dB+19%
  5. Optical zoom1.3× vs 1.1×+18%

Why is Photon Life PK32 better than Orbital IN0061SL?

  1. Light source life15,000 h vs 30,000 h2×
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm1,100 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000,000:1400:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHLG—
3D playbackYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.21:11.12:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)2.59:11.46:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.68 m2.48 m
Smallest image size—60″
Largest image size—150″
Optical zoom1.3×1.1×
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption300 W—
Light source life15,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise27 dB32 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—30 dB
Weight—2.2 kg
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare