- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Orbital IN0061SL vs NeoPix 750
InFocus Orbital IN0061SL vs Philips NeoPix 750
What Orbital IN0061SL does better (2) and where NeoPix 750 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is Orbital IN0061SL better than NeoPix 750?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
Why is NeoPix 750 better than Orbital IN0061SL?
- Light source life15,000 h vs 30,000 h2×
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 14 W+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | Laser | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HLG | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.21:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.59:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.68 m | — |
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.3× | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 14 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 300 W | — |
| Light source life | 15,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 27 dB | — |
| Width | — | 305 mm |
| Height | — | 119 mm |
| Depth | — | 319 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
