How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Vista II IN0048ST vs NeoPix 750

InFocus Vista II IN0048ST vs Philips NeoPix 750

What Vista II IN0048ST does better (4) and where NeoPix 750 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

InFocus Vista II IN0048ST
InFocus · 2025Vista II IN0048ST
7.3Score
4 advantages≈ US$710
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
2 advantages≈ US$610

Why is Vista II IN0048ST better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  4. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix 750: No

Why is NeoPix 750 better than Vista II IN0048ST?

  1. Light source life15,000 h vs 30,000 h2×
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 14 W+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLamp—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)30,000:1—
HDR supportNo—
3D playbackYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio0.5:1—
Throw typeShort throw (0.4–1.0:1)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image1.11 m—
Largest image size—120″
Optical zoom2×—
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W14 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption267 W—
Light source life15,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise27 dB—
Width—305 mm
Height—119 mm
Depth—319 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare