- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HBP-1000 vs TX-113
ivolum HBP-1000 vs Technaxx TX-113
What HBP-1000 does better (1) and where TX-113 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
HBP-1000TX-113
| HBP-1000 | TX-113 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 168 mm | 86 mm | +82 mm |
| Width | 336 mm | 150 mm | +186 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 204 mm | −124 mm |
| Weight | 0.9 kg | 1 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HBP-1000 better than TX-113?
- Weight0.94 kg vs 1.04 kg+11%
Why is TX-113 better than HBP-1000?
- Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life30,000 h vs 40,000 h+33%
- Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 2,000:12×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 1,000 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 2,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.21 m | — |
| Smallest image size | — | 32″ |
| Largest image size | — | 176″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 4 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 50 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 40,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 54 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 32 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.94 kg | 1.04 kg |
| Width | 336 mm | 150 mm |
| Height | 168 mm | 86 mm |
| Depth | 80 mm | 204 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
