How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. N1 Ultra vs NeoPix 730

JMGO N1 Ultra vs Philips NeoPix 730

What N1 Ultra does better (3) and where NeoPix 730 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JMGO N1 Ultra
JMGO · 2024N1 Ultra
9.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$1,300
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 730
Philips · 2023NeoPix 730
8.9Score
2 advantages
8.9Setup & placement2.3
9.0Smart features & sound9.0
9.1Noise, lifetime & portability9.4

Why is N1 Ultra better than NeoPix 730?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. AutofocusYes · NeoPix 730: No
  3. Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix 730: No

Why is NeoPix 730 better than N1 Ultra?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,600:1 vs 3,000:1+88%
  2. Weight4.5 kg vs 2.7 kg+67%
Specifications

Side by side

JMGO N1 UltraJMGO N1 Ultra≈ US$1,3009.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,600:13,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11.65:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m3.65 m
Largest image size—120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYesNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Internal storage32 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version2.1—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise26 dB—
Weight4.5 kg2.7 kg
Width—305 mm
Height—119 mm
Depth—319 mm
ColoursGrey, BlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare