How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. O2 vs VisionMaster Pro

JMGO O2 vs Valerion VisionMaster Pro

What O2 does better (1) and where VisionMaster Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JMGO O2
JMGO · 2025O2
8.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$2,150
Higher score
vs
Valerion VisionMaster Pro
Valerion · 2025VisionMaster Pro
2 advantages≈ US$1,950
6.4Picture5.2

Why is O2 better than VisionMaster Pro?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,800 lm vs 2,500 lm+12%

Why is VisionMaster Pro better than O2?

  1. HDMI inputs1 vs 33×
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)20 W vs 24 W+20%
Specifications

Side by side

JMGO O2JMGO O2≈ US$2,1508.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLaserLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,800 lm2,500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—10,000:1
Lens & placement
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size—300″
Lens shiftNone—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)20 W24 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Internal storage64 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs13
HDMI version—2.1
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)YesYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—25,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—7 kg
Width—260 mm
Height—185 mm
Depth—216 mm
ColoursGrey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare