How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. PicoPlay vs NeoPix 460

JMGO PicoPlay vs Philips NeoPix 460

What PicoPlay does better (0) and where NeoPix 460 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JMGO PicoPlay
JMGO · 2025PicoPlay
8.9Score
0 advantages≈ US$300
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 460
Philips · 2026NeoPix 460
1 advantage≈ US$270
5.7Picture7.9

Why is PicoPlay better than NeoPix 460?

PicoPlay has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix 460 better than PicoPlay?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)400 lm vs 500 lm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JMGO PicoPlayJMGO PicoPlay≈ US$3008.9
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)400 lm500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)400:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10—
Colour gamut (DCI-P3)90%—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size200″—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Automatic screen fitYes—
Built-in stand / gimbalYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)8 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TV—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Chromecast built-inYes—
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI eARCYes—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—No
Battery, power & lifetime
USB-C power input (power bank)Yes—
Power consumption65 W—
Light source life—500 h
Design & noise
Fan noise26 dB—
Weight0.73 kg—
Width85 mm—
Height166 mm—
Depth85 mm—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare