- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ7 vs DLA-NZ700
JVC DLA-NZ7 vs JVC DLA-NZ700
What DLA-NZ7 does better (1) and where DLA-NZ700 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is DLA-NZ7 better than DLA-NZ700?
- Audio outputYes · DLA-NZ700: No
Why is DLA-NZ700 better than DLA-NZ7?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- Native panel resolution3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)40,000:1 vs 80,000:12×
- Fan noise24 dB vs 23 dB+4%
- Weight22.5 kg vs 15.2 kg+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| Native panel resolution | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 2,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 40,000:1 | 80,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.76:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | — |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 200″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 280 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 24 dB | 23 dB |
| Weight | 22.5 kg | 15.2 kg |
| Width | — | 450 mm |
| Height | — | 180 mm |
| Depth | — | 479 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
