- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- DLA-NZ700 vs NEBULA
JVC DLA-NZ700 vs Nebula NEBULA
What DLA-NZ700 does better (5) and where NEBULA wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
DLA-NZ700NEBULA
| DLA-NZ700 | NEBULA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 180 mm | 230 mm | −50 mm |
| Width | 450 mm | 183 mm | +267 mm |
| Depth | 479 mm | 204 mm | +275 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DLA-NZ700 better than NEBULA?
- Resolution (on screen)4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,300 lm vs 1,500 lm+53%
- Light source life20,000 h vs 1,500 h13.3×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)80,000:1 vs 1,500:153.3×
- Native panel resolution4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Why is NEBULA better than DLA-NZ700?
NEBULA has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | — |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,300 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 80,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 200″ | — |
| Optical zoom | 1.6× | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | — |
| USB port | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 280 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 1,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 23 dB | — |
| Weight | 15.2 kg | — |
| Width | 450 mm | 183 mm |
| Height | 180 mm | 230 mm |
| Depth | 479 mm | 204 mm |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Black |
