- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- LX-NZ3 vs LX-NZ30
JVC LX-NZ3 vs JVC LX-NZ30
What LX-NZ3 does better (0) and where LX-NZ30 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
LX-NZ3LX-NZ30
| LX-NZ3 | LX-NZ30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 145 mm | 145 mm | = |
| Width | 405 mm | 405 mm | = |
| Depth | 341 mm | 341 mm | = |
| Weight | 6.3 kg | 5.9 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is LX-NZ3 better than LX-NZ30?
LX-NZ3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is LX-NZ30 better than LX-NZ3?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm vs 3,300 lm+10%
- Ethernet (LAN)No · LX-NZ3: Yes
- Weight6.3 kg vs 5.9 kg+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,000 lm | 3,300 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.36:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.17:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.01 m |
| Smallest image size | 60″ | 60″ |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 200″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.6× | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | Vertical and horizontal |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB-C video input | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 34 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 29 dB |
| Weight | 6.3 kg | 5.9 kg |
| Width | 405 mm | 405 mm |
| Height | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Depth | 341 mm | 341 mm |
