- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Chill vs NeoPix 256
Kiano Chill vs Philips NeoPix 256
What Chill does better (1) and where NeoPix 256 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is Chill better than NeoPix 256?
- Light source life1,500 h vs 1,000 h+50%
Why is NeoPix 256 better than Chill?
NeoPix 256 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 1,500 h | 1,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | White, Silver, Grey |
