- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- FLIK HD10 vs NeoPix 250
Kodak FLIK HD10 vs Philips NeoPix 250
What FLIK HD10 does better (0) and where NeoPix 250 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.3Picture2.2
6.0Smart features & sound2.9
Why is FLIK HD10 better than NeoPix 250?
FLIK HD10 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 250 better than FLIK HD10?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 250 lm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| 4K method | — | 4K input only (downscaled) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 250 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.31:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.9 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 80″ |
| Largest image size | — | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 2.5 kg |
| Width | — | 239 mm |
| Height | — | 188 mm |
| Depth | — | 141 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
