- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Ultra vs NeoPix 100
Kodak Ultra vs Philips NeoPix 100
What Ultra does better (0) and where NeoPix 100 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is Ultra better than NeoPix 100?
Ultra has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix 100 better than Ultra?
- Audio outputNo · Ultra: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 100 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.25 m |
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.8 kg |
| Width | — | 158 mm |
| Height | — | 205 mm |
| Depth | — | 78 mm |
| Colours | Black | White |
