How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Ultra vs NeoPix 122

Kodak Ultra vs Philips NeoPix 122

What Ultra does better (0) and where NeoPix 122 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Ultra
Kodak · 2024Ultra
0 advantages
vs
Philips NeoPix 122
Philips · 2024NeoPix 122
4.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$230
Higher score

Why is Ultra better than NeoPix 122?

Ultra has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is NeoPix 122 better than Ultra?

  1. Audio outputNo · Ultra: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 122Philips NeoPix 122≈ US$2304.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution—1280 × 720 (HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm100 lm
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.47:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.25 m
Smallest image size—65″
Largest image size—65″
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—42 W
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—0.85 kg
Width—225 mm
Height—102 mm
Depth—190 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare