How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Ultra vs Neopix 130

Kodak Ultra vs Philips Neopix 130

What Ultra does better (0) and where Neopix 130 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Ultra
Kodak · 2024Ultra
0 advantages
vs
Philips Neopix 130
Philips · 2024Neopix 130
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score

Why is Ultra better than Neopix 130?

Ultra has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Neopix 130 better than Ultra?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm vs 120 lm+20%
  2. Audio outputNo · Ultra: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips Neopix 130Philips Neopix 130≈ US$1505.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm120 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—500:1
Lens & placement
Largest image size—70″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—1.5 kg
Width—141 mm
Height—162 mm
Depth—123 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare