- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- V-LED50 vs TriVision Ultra
Krüger & Matz V-LED50 vs NexiGo TriVision Ultra
What V-LED50 does better (1) and where TriVision Ultra wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Picture6.0
Why is V-LED50 better than TriVision Ultra?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,800 lm vs 2,600 lm+8%
Why is TriVision Ultra better than V-LED50?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Largest image size120″ vs 300″2.5×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 33×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · V-LED50: Yes
- Audio outputNo · V-LED50: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | — | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,800 lm | 2,600 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,500:1 | — |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Dolby Vision | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 120″ | 300″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 30 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 3 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 50,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 45 dB | — |
| Weight | 2 kg | — |
| Width | 300 mm | — |
| Height | 150 mm | — |
| Depth | 200 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
