- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- LV-HD240 vs ML1050ST+
La Vague LV-HD240 vs Optoma ML1050ST+
What LV-HD240 does better (2) and where ML1050ST+ wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is LV-HD240 better than ML1050ST+?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Largest image size168″ vs 100″+68%
Why is ML1050ST+ better than LV-HD240?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
- AutofocusNo · LV-HD240: Yes
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1280 × 800 (WXGA) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 1,000 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 2,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 20,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 85 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 0.8:1 |
| Throw type | — | Short throw (0.4–1.0:1) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 1.77 m |
| Largest image size | 168″ | 100″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 77 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 22 dB |
| Weight | — | 0.42 kg |
| Width | — | 112 mm |
| Height | — | 57 mm |
| Depth | — | 123 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
