- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- LV-HD240 vs Neopix 130
La Vague LV-HD240 vs Philips Neopix 130
What LV-HD240 does better (1) and where Neopix 130 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Setup & placement7.5
Why is LV-HD240 better than Neopix 130?
- Largest image size168″ vs 70″2.4×
Why is Neopix 130 better than LV-HD240?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- AutofocusNo · LV-HD240: Yes
- Automatic keystone correctionNo · LV-HD240: Yes
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 120 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 2,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 168″ | 70″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | Yes |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.5 kg |
| Width | — | 141 mm |
| Height | — | 162 mm |
| Depth | — | 123 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
